[1]
A. G. Jordan 1997. Protest business? Mobilizing campaigning groups. Manchester University Press.
[2]
Ackerly, B.A. et al. 2006. Feminist methodologies for international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[3]
Adam Jones 1996. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 22, 4 (1996), 405–429.
[4]
Aldridge, Alan, 1947- Surveying the social world : principles and practice in survey research. Buckingham : Open University Press, 2001.
[5]
ALEX DANCHEV and DEBBIE LISLE 2009. Introduction: art, politics, purpose. Review of International Studies. 35, 4 (2009).
[6]
Anderson, B. 2010. Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography. 34, 6 (Dec. 2010), 777–798. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600.
[7]
ANDREW W. NEAL 2006. Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception. Security Dialogue. 37, 1 (2006), 31–46.
[8]
Andrews, R. 2003. Chapter 9 Summary. Research questions. Continuum. 79–84.
[9]
Andrews, R. 2003. Extract from [IN] Research Questions. Research questions. Continuum.
[10]
Aradau, Claudia 2014. Geneaology [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge.
[11]
Aradau, Claudia 2014. Geneaology [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge.
[12]
Aradau, Claudia 2014. Visuality [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge.
[13]
Aradau, Claudia; Rens van Munster Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 89–115.
[14]
Aradau, Claudia; Rens van Munster Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 89–115.
[15]
Asad, T. 1991. Afterword: From the History of colonial anthropology to the Anthropology of western hegemony [IN] Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge. Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge. University of Wisconsin Press. 314–324.
[16]
Atkinson, P. et al. 1999. Ethnography: Post, Past and Present. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 28, 5 (Oct. 1999), 460–471. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/089124199028005004.
[17]
Augoustinos, M. and Every, D. 2007. Contemporary Racist Discourse: Taboos against racism and racist accusations [IN] Language, discourse and social psychology. Language, discourse and social psychology. Palgrave Macmillan.
[18]
Babb, James. 2012. Chapter 21. Empirical political analysis. [electronic resource]. Pearson.
[19]
Benjamin Baez 2002. Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research. 2, Issue 1 (2002), 35–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001638.
[20]
Bhabha, H.K. 2004. The location of culture. Routledge.
[21]
Bhambra, G.K. 2017. Brexit, Trump, and ‘methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. The British Journal of Sociology. 68, (Nov. 2017), S214–S232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12317.
[22]
BILLIG, M. 1988. The notion of ‘prejudice’: Some rhetorical and ideological aspects. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. 8, 1–2 (1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.1-2.91.
[23]
Blanchard, E.M. 2003. Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 28, 4 (Jun. 2003), 1289–1312. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/368328.
[24]
Bleiker, Roland 2015. Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES. (2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815583084.
[25]
Blix, H. 2005. Disarming Iraq: the search for weapons of mass destruction. Bloomsbury.
[26]
Bogner, A. et al. 2009. Interviewing experts. Palgrave Macmillan.
[27]
Borneman, John and Abdellah Hammoudi 2009. The Fieldwork Encounter, Experience, and the Making of Truth: An Introduction [IN] Being there: the fieldwork encounter and the making of truth. Being There: the Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth. University of California Press.
[28]
Brown, M. 1999. Reconceptualizing public and private in urban regime theory: governance in AIDS politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 23, 1 (Mar. 1999), 45–69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00179.
[29]
Bryant, A. 2017. Grounded Theory and Grounded Theorizing. Oxford University Press.
[30]
Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K. 2007. The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. SAGE.
[31]
Bulmer, M. 1982. Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. Macmillan.
[32]
Burnham, P. 2008. Chapter 9. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan. 213–230.
[33]
Burnham, P. 2008. Introduction and Chapter 1 [IN] Research Methods in Politics. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[34]
Burnham, Peter et al. Chapter 4 [IN] Research methods in politics. Research methods in politics / Peter Burnham ... [et al.]. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 96–137.
[35]
Burnham, Peter et al. Introduction and Chapter 1. Research methods in politics / Peter Burnham ... [et al.]. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 1–37.
[36]
Butler, Judith 2007. Torture and the ethics of photography. Environment & Planning D: Society & Space. 25, Issue 6 (2007), 951–966. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/d2506jb.
[37]
Callahan, W.A. 2015. The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 43, 3 (Jun. 2015), 891–910. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815578767.
[38]
Campbell, David Geopolitics and visuality: sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography. 26.
[39]
Charmaz, K. 2006. Chapter 1 An Invitation to Grounded Theory. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE. 1–12.
[40]
Childs, S. 2004. A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 6, 1 (Feb. 2004), 3–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00124.x.
[41]
Clarke, A.E. 2012. Feminism, Grounded Theory, and Situational Analysis Revisited. Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. SAGE Publications, Inc. 388–412.
[42]
Cohen, C.J. 1999. The boundaries of blackness: AIDS and the breakdown of Black politics. University of Chicago Press.
[43]
Corbin, J.M. and Strauss, A.L. 2015. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE.
[44]
Coulthard, G.S. 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. University of Minnesota Press.
[45]
Cynthia Enloe 2004. ‘Gender’ Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 80, 1 (2004).
[46]
Czaja, R. and Blair, J. 2005. Designing surveys: a guide to decisions and procedures. Pine Forge.
[47]
Dainty, A.R.J. et al. 2000. A grounded theory of women’s career under-achievement in large UK construction companies. Construction Management and Economics. 18, 2 (Mar. 2000), 239–250. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900370861.
[48]
Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. SAGE.
[49]
Della Porta, D. and Rucht, D. eds. 2013. Meeting democracy: power and deliberation in global justice movements. Cambridge University Press.
[50]
Drzewiecka, A. 2007. the joys and perils of conducting field research in eastern europe. European Political Science. 6, 3 (Sep. 2007), 295–301. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210135.
[51]
Elliott, A.C. and Woodward, W.A. 2016. IBM SPSS by Example: a practical guide to statistical data analysis. SAGE.
[52]
Enloe, C.H. 2000. Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. University of California Press.
[53]
ESRC | The Economic and Social Research Council: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/.
[54]
Etherington, Kim 2007. Ethical research in reflexive relationships. QUALITATIVE INQUIRY;. 13, 5 (2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301175.
[55]
Fairclough, N. 2010. Introduction and Chapter 9. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. Longman.
[56]
Fanon, F. 2008. Black skin, white masks. Pluto Press.
[57]
Farson, A.S. and Phythian, M. 2011. The Politics of Commissions of Inquiry into Security and Intelligence Controversies in Britain [IN] Commissions of Inquiry and National Security. Commissions of inquiry and national security: comparative approaches. Praeger Security International.
[58]
Field, A.P. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
[59]
FINE, G.A. 1993. TEN LIES OF ETHNOGRAPHY. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 22, 3 (Oct. 1993), 267–294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/089124193022003001.
[60]
Foddy, W. 1993. Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires. Cambridge University Press.
[61]
FRANK MÖLLER 2009. The looking/not looking dilemma. Review of International Studies. 35, 4 (2009).
[62]
Furlong, Paul and Marsh, David A skin not a sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science. Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. 184–211.
[63]
George Herbert Mead Mind, Self, and Society. University Of Chicago Press.
[64]
Gerber, A. 2011. Field Experiments in Political Science. Cambridge handbook of experimental political science. J.N. Druckman, ed. Cambridge University Press.
[65]
Gerber, A. 2011. The Logic and Design of the Survey Experiment: An Autobiography of a Methodological Innovation. Cambridge handbook of experimental political science. J.N. Druckman, ed. Cambridge University Press.
[66]
Gillespie, A. and Michelson, M.R. 2011. Participant Observation and the Political Scientist: Possibilities, Priorities, and Practicalities. PS: Political Science & Politics. 44, 02 (Apr. 2011), 261–265. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511000096.
[67]
Goffman, E. 1990. Introduction. The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin. 13–27.
[68]
Griggs, StevenHowarth, David 2004. A transformative political campaign? The new rhetoric of protest against airport expansion in the UK. Journal of Political Ideologies;. 9, 2 (2004), 181–201.
[69]
Grix, Jonathan 2002. Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research. Politics. 22, Issue 3 (2002). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00173.
[70]
Grotenhuis, M. te and Matthijssen, A. 2016. Basic SPSS tutorial. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[71]
Gupta, Akhil and James Ferguson 1997. The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology [IN] Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science. Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. University of California Press.
[72]
Gynnild, Astrid 2017. Celebrating 50 years of grounded theory: onward and forward Editorial. Grounded Theory Review. 16, 1 (2017), 29–32.
[73]
Hajer, M.A. 1997. Chapter 2 [IN] The Politics of Environmental Discourse. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford University Press.
[74]
Halperin, S. and Heath, O. Chapter 11: Surveys [IN] Political research : methods and practical skills. Political research : methods and practical skills. Oxford : Oxford University Press, c2012.
[75]
Halperin, S. and Heath, O. 2020. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[76]
Halperin, S. and Heath, O. 2020. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[77]
Halperin, S. and Heath, O. 2017. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[78]
Halperin, Sandra. Chapter 11. Political research : methods and practical skills / Sandra Halperin and Oliver Heath. Oxford : Oxford University Press, c2012.
[79]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver Chapter 12. Political research : methods and practical skills. Oxford : Oxford University Press, c2012. 287–308.
[80]
Hancke, Bob 2010. Chapter 11 The Challenge of Research Design [IN] Theory and Methods in Political Science. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[81]
Hancke, Bob The challenge of research design. Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. 232–248.
[82]
Hansen, L. 2014. Hansen, L. ‘Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies’ [IN} Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Taylor & Francis.
[83]
Hansen, L. 2017. Reading comics for the field of International Relations: Theory, method and the Bosnian War. European Journal of International Relations. 23, 3 (Sep. 2017), 581–608. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116656763.
[84]
Hansen, Lene 2001. Gender, nation, rape: Bosnia and the construction of security. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 3, 1 (2001).
[85]
HANSEN, LENE How images make world politics: International icons and the case of Abu Ghraib. Review of International Studies. 41, 263–288.
[86]
Haraway, D 2013. The persistence of vision [IN] Visual Culture Reader. The visual culture reader. Routledge.
[87]
Hart, C. 2018. Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. SAGE.
[88]
Hazell, R. et al. 2012. Pre-Appointment Scrutiny Hearings in the British House of Commons: All Bark, or Some Bite? The Journal of Legislative Studies. 18, 2 (Jun. 2012), 222–241. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2012.673066.
[89]
Heras, M. and Tàbara, J.D. 2014. Let’s play transformations! Performative methods for sustainability. Sustainability Science. 9, 3 (Jul. 2014), 379–398. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0245-9.
[90]
Herbert Blumer Symbolic Interactionism. University of California Press.
[91]
Higgs, J. 2012. Chapter 8 Embodiment in Research Practices [IN] Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching: Living Research. Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching: Living Research. J. Higgs, ed. SensePublishers. 77–86.
[92]
Hobbs, D. and Wright, R. 2006. The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. SAGE.
[93]
Hollis, M. and Smith, S. 1991. Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon.
[94]
Homan, R. 1992. The Ethics of Open Methods. The British Journal of Sociology. 43, 3 (Sep. 1992). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/591538.
[95]
How do I interpret the results from crosstabs? | SPSS FAQ - IDRE Stats: https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/faq/how-do-i-interpret-the-results-from-crosstabs/.
[96]
How to Do a Discourse Analysis - PoliticsEastAsia.com: http://www.politicseastasia.com/studying/how-to-do-a-discourse-analysis/.
[97]
Howarth, David R. Case study chapters [IN] Discourse theory and political analysis : identities, hegemonies and social change / edited by David Howarth, Aletta J. Norval and Yannis Stavrakakis. Discourse theory and political analysis : identities, hegemonies and social change / edited by David Howarth, Aletta J. Norval and Yannis Stavrakakis. Manchester : Manchester University Press, 2000.
[98]
Howarth, David R. Discourse. Buckingham : Open University Press, 2000.
[99]
Howarth, D.R. 2000. Discourse. Open University Press.
[100]
Hutchings, K. 2008. 1988 and 1998: Contrast and Continuity in Feminist International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 37, 1 (Aug. 2008), 97–105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808093732.
[101]
Iraq Inquiry - Sir John Chilcot’s public statement, 6 July 2016: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20171123124608/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-inquiry/sir-john-chilcots-public-statement/.
[102]
J. Ann Tickner 1997. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 4 (1997).
[103]
Jabri, V. and O’Gorman, E. 1999. Women, culture, and international relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[104]
Jackson, P.T. 2011. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge.
[105]
Jan Jindy Pettman 1996. Worlding Women : A Feminist International Politics. Routledge.
[106]
Jeremy Walker; Melinda Cooper 2011. Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue. 42, 2 (2011), 143–160.
[107]
Jones, A. 2008. Gender Inclusive. Routledge.
[108]
Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss 1990. Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 19, 6 (1990), 418–427.
[109]
Kirin Narayan 1993. How Native Is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist? American Anthropologist. 95, 3 (1993).
[110]
Klotz, A. and Prakash, D. 2008. Qualitative methods in international relations: a pluralist guide. Palgrave Macmillan.
[111]
Koo, K.L. 2002. Confronting a Disciplinary Blindness: Women, War and Rape in the International Politics of Security. Australian Journal of Political Science. 37, 3 (Nov. 2002), 525–536. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114022000032744.
[112]
Kurki, M. 2008. Chapter 1 [IN] Causation in international relations: reclaiming causal analysis. Causation in International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
[113]
Kurki, M. and Wright, M. 2016. Internation Relations and Social Science [IN] International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. T. Dunne et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[114]
Lamont, C. 2015. Chapter 1 [IN] Research Methods in International Relations. Research methods in international relations. SAGE.
[115]
Lamont, C. 2015. Chapter 2 [IN] Research Methods in International Relations. Research methods in international relations. SAGE.
[116]
Latham, A. 2003. Research, Performance, and Doing Human Geography: Some Reflections on the Diary-Photograph, Diary-Interview Method. Environment and Planning A. 35, 11 (Nov. 2003), 1993–2017. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/a3587.
[117]
Lebow, R.N. 2014. Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
[118]
Leech, Beth L. 2003. Asking Questions: Techniques for Semistructured Interviews. Political Science & Politics. 35, 04 (2003), 665–668. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001129.
[119]
Leech, Beth L. 2003. Interview Methods in Political Science. Political Science & Politics. 35, 04 (2003), 663–664. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001117.
[120]
Letherby, G. 2003. Feminist research in theory and practice. Open University Press.
[121]
Lilleker, D.G. 2003. Interviewing the Political Elite: Navigating a Potential Minefield. Politics. 23, 3 (Sep. 2003), 207–214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00198.
[122]
Lisle, D. and Johnson, H.L. 2018. Lost in the aftermath. Security Dialogue. (Apr. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618762271.
[123]
Little, R. 1991. International Relations and the Methodological Turn. Political Studies. 39, 3 (Sep. 1991), 463–478. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01623.x.
[124]
Mamdani, M. 2012. Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Harvard University Press.
[125]
Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. 2010. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[126]
Marshall, H. and Raabe, B. 1993. Political discourse: Talking about nationalization and privatization [IN] Discourse analytic research: repertoires and readings of texts in action. Discourse analytic research: repertoires and readings of texts in action. Routledge. 35–51.
[127]
Messaris, P. 1994. Visual ‘literacy’: image, mind, and reality. Westview Press.
[128]
Metz, C. 1985. Photography and Fetish. October. 34, (Autumn 1985). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/778490.
[129]
Milliken, Jennifer The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 5, Issue 2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.
[130]
Mirzoeff, N. 2013. Introduction: For Critical Visuality Studies [IN] Visual Culture Reader. The visual culture reader. Routledge.
[131]
Moon, Claire 2006. Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Social & Legal Studies. 15, 2 (2006), 257–276200615.
[132]
Moore, C. and Shepherd, L.J. 2010. Aesthetics and International Relations: Towards a Global Politics. Global Society. 24, 3 (Jul. 2010), 299–309. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2010.485564.
[133]
Oktay, J.S. 2012. Grounded Theory. Oxford University Press.
[134]
Ontology and Epistemology: http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/engl257/Classical/ontology_and_epistemology.htm.
[135]
Oppenheim, A.N. 1992. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Continuum.
[136]
Pallant, J. 2016. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill Education.
[137]
Pattie, C.J. et al. 2004. Citizenship in Britain: values, participation, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
[138]
Paul Atkinson and Martyn Hammersley 1994. Chapter 15 Ethnography and Participant Observation [IN] Handbook of qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[139]
Paul Willis and Mats Trondman 2000. Manifesto for ‘Ethnography’. Ethnography. 1, 1 (2000), 5–16.
[140]
Peter John Chapter 13 Quantative methods [IN] Theory and methods in political science. Theory and methods in political science. David Marsh and Gerry Stoker, eds. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
[141]
Peterson, V.S. 1992. Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Lynne Rienner.
[142]
Peterson, V.S. and Runyan, A.S. 1999. Global gender issues. Westview Press.
[143]
Phythian, M. 2012. Policing Uncertainty: Intelligence, Security and Risk. Intelligence and National Security. 27, 2 (Apr. 2012), 187–205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2012.661642.
[144]
Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter: http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage.
[145]
R. Charli Carpenter 2002. Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Nonfeminist Standpoint? International Studies Review. 4, 3 (2002).
[146]
Raddon, D.A. Early Stage Research Training: Epistemology & Ontology in Social Science Research.
[147]
Ralph, Jason 2011. After Chilcot: the ‘doctrine of international community’ and the UK decision to invade Iraq. British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 13, 3 (2011).
[148]
Ranciere, J. 2013. Notes on the photographic image [IN] Visual Culture Reader. The visual culture reader. Routledge.
[149]
Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. 1998. Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research. Sage.
[150]
Ridley, D. 2013. The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. SAGE.
[151]
Robin L. Riley, Chandra Talpade Mohanty And Minnie Bruce Pratt, Editors. 15AD. Feminism and War. Zed Books.
[152]
Rose, G. 2016. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE.
[153]
Rose, G. and DP Tolia-Kelly 2012. . Visuality/materiality: introducing a manifesto for practice [IN] Visuality/Materiality: images, objects, and practices. Visuality/materiality: images, objects and practices. Ashgate.
[154]
Rowley, C. 2010. Popular culture and the politics of the visual [IN] Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Routledge.
[155]
Said, Edward 1994. Culture and imperialism. Vintage.
[156]
Said, E.W. 2003. Orientalism. Penguin.
[157]
Saunders, C. 2013. Chapter 7 [IN] Environmental networks and social movement theory. Environmental networks and social movement theory. Bloomsbury Academic.
[158]
Saunders, Clare1 c.e.saunders@soton.ac.uk 2012. Reformism and radicalism in the Climate Camp in Britain: benign coexistence, tensions and prospects for bridging. Environmental Politics. 21, Issue 5 (2012), 829–846. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.692937.
[159]
Sayad, A. et al. 2004. tbc [IN] The suffering of the immigrant. The suffering of the immigrant. Polity.
[160]
Schatz, E. and ebrary, Inc 2009. Political ethnography: what immersion contributes to the study of power. University of Chicago Press.
[161]
Schlag, G. and Geis, A. 2017. Visualizing violence: aesthetics and ethics in international politics. Global Discourse. 7, 2–3 (Jul. 2017), 193–200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1359995.
[162]
Shapiro, M.J. 2009. Cinematic geopolitics. Routledge.
[163]
Shepherd, Laura J. 2017. Aesthetics, Ethics, and Visual Research in the Digital Age: "Undone in the Face of the Otter’. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES;. (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816684255.
[164]
Shively, W.P. 2017. The craft of political research. Routledge.
[165]
Skinner, Q. 1969. Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory. 8, 1 (1969). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2504188.
[166]
Sluka, Jeffrey A Participant observation in violent social contexts. Human Organization; Oklahoma City. 49, 2.
[167]
Smith, L.T. 2012. tbc [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
[168]
Spatz, Ben 2017. Embodied Research: A Methodology. Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies. 13, Issue 2, p1-31 (2017), 1–31.
[169]
Spivak, G.C. 1988. In other worlds: essays in cultural politics. Routledge.
[170]
Stevens, Daniel P.Allen, BLawrence, EDSullivan, JL 2015. Partisanship and Perceptions of Fairness: Ignoring the Facts. Partisanship and Perceptions of Fairness: Ignoring the Facts. 3, (2015), 32–43.
[171]
Stevens, Daniel1 2015. War and Elections. International Studies Quarterly. 59, Issue 3, p477-489. 13p. 1 Diagram, 6 Charts (2015), 477–489. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12159.
[172]
Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J. 1997. Grounded theory in practice. Sage Publications.
[173]
Strauss, L. 1957. What is Political Philosophy? The Journal of Politics. 19, 3 (Aug. 1957), 343–368. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2126765.
[174]
Survey Research: https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/survey.php.
[175]
Sutherns, R. et al. 2014. Exploring the Concept of Embodied Research: Does It Take One to Know One?. SAGE Publications, Ltd.
[176]
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires 1998. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies. 24, 2 (1998).
[177]
The National Archives: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/.
[178]
The Political Studies Association: http://www.psa.ac.uk/.
[179]
The Power of Images in Global Politics: 2018. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/03/08/the-power-of-images-in-global-politics/.
[180]
Thomas, O.D. 2017. Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry. Politics. 37, 4 (Nov. 2017), 371–385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716688488.
[181]
Thomas, Susan J. Designing surveys that work! : a step-by-step guide. London : Sage, 1999.
[182]
Tony Blair statement in response to The Report of the Iraq Inquiry: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-tony-blair-read-response-statement-in-full-iraq-war-inquiry-a7123251.html.
[183]
Urquhart, C. 2013. Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications, Ltd.
[184]
Vacchelli, E. 2018. Embodied research in migration studies: using creative and participatory approaches. Policy Press.
[185]
Vicki Squire: 12 days in Lampedusa: The potential and perils of a photo essay @FocaalBlog: http://www.focaalblog.com/2016/01/11/vicki-squire-12-days-in-lampedusa-the-potential-and-perils-of-a-photo-essay/.
[186]
Vromnen, A. 2010. Debating methods: Rediscovering qualitative approaches. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan. 258–261.
[187]
VUCETIC, S. 2011. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 37, 03 (Jul. 2011), 1295–1312. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000938.
[188]
Wall, D. 1999. Earth First! and the anti-roads movement: radical environmentalism & comparative social movements. Routledge.
[189]
Weldes, J. and Rowley, C. 2015. So, how does popular culture relate to world politics? [IN] Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. E-International Relations Publishing.
[190]
Young, R. 2001. Postcolonialism: an historical introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
[191]
Zalewski, M. 2000. Feminism after postmodernism: theorising through practice. Routledge.
[192]
Zalewski, M. 2014. ‘Feminist International Relations: Making sense of’ [IN] Gender Matters in Global Politics. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Taylor & Francis.
[193]
Zalewski, M. 1998. ‘Introduction: From the "Woman” Question to the "Man” Question in International Relations’ [IN] The "Man” Question in International Relations. The ‘man’ question in international relations. WestviewPress.
[194]
Zalewski, M. 1995. ‘Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs. 71, 2 (Apr. 1995), 339–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2623438.
[195]
26AD. A survey in 10 steps.
[196]
24AD. Complex Research Terminology Simplified: Paradigms, Ontology, Epistemology and Methodology.
[197]
9AD. David James: How to get clear about method, methodology, epistemology and ontology, once and for all.
[198]
12AD. Enter data and define variables in SPSS.
[199]
10AD. Entering Data into SPSS.
[200]
27AD. Frequencies and Descriptive Statistics.
[201]
2003. Interviewing Political Elites: Lessons from Russia. Political Science & Politics. 35, 04 (2003), 683–688. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001178.
[202]
Lammers, William, and Pietro Badia. 2013. Fundamentals of Behavioral Research, Chapter 7.
[203]
London School of Economics guide to discourse analysis.
[204]
2012. Mobilization: An International Journal, special issue on the Dynamics of Street Demonstrations. 17, 3 (2012).
[205]
14AD. SPSS for Beginners 2 Frequency Counts and Descriptive Statistics.
[206]
25AD. Teun van Dijk. Discourse and Knowledge.
[207]
2009. Three images by Angus Boulton. Review of International Studies. 35, 4 (2009).
[208]
2009. Three images by Suzanne Opton. Review of International Studies. 35, 4 (2009).
[209]
University of Leeds, Information Systems Services guide to Questionnaire Design by Thomas Burgess.
