‘A Passage to Britain - BBC’ (no date). Available at: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/playlists/183729.
Ackerly, B.A., Stern, M. and True, J. (2006) Feminist methodologies for international relations. [1st ed.]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://encore.exeter.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2555274.
Adam Jones (1996) ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 22(4), pp. 405–429. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20097459&site=eds-live&scope=site.
ALEX DANCHEV and DEBBIE LISLE (2009) ‘Introduction: art, politics, purpose’, Review of International Studies, 35(4). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588073?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Anderson, B. (2010) ‘Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies’, Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), pp. 777–798. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600.
ANDREW W. NEAL (2006) ‘Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception’, Security Dialogue, 37(1), pp. 31–46. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26299471&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Andrews, R. (2003) Research questions. London: Continuum. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781441106766.
Aradau, Claudia (2014a) ‘Genealogy [IN]  Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis’, in Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0.
Aradau, Claudia (2014b) ‘Visuality [IN]  Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis’, in Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0.
Aradau, Claudia; Rens van Munster (no date) ‘Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future’, European Journal of International Relations, 13, pp. 89–115. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792.
Aradau, ClaudiaRens van Munster (no date) ‘Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future’, European Journal of International Relations, 13, pp. 89–115. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792.
Benjamin Baez (2002) ‘Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency.’, Qualitative Research., 2(Issue 1), pp. 35–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001638.
Bhabha, H.K. (2004) The location of culture. [New ed.]. London: Routledge. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781136751042.
Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2017) ‘Brexit, Trump, and "methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class’, BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY; [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12317.
Blanchard, E.M. (2003) ‘Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(4), pp. 1289–1312. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/368328.
Bleiker, R. (2015) ‘Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), pp. 872–890. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815583084.
Bleiker, R. (2018) The Power of Images in Global Politics. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/03/08/the-power-of-images-in-global-politics/.
Blix, H. (2005) Disarming Iraq. [Updated edition with a new chapter]. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bonditti, P. et al. (2015) ‘Geneaology [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis’, in Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 159–188. Available at: https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781134716197.
Borneman, J. and Hammoudi, A. (2009) ‘The Fieldwork Encounter, Experience, and the Making of Truth: An Introduction [IN] Being there: the fieldwork encounter and the making of truth.’, in Being There: the Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pphf4.
Bulmer, M. (1982) Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. London: Macmillan.
Butler, Judith (2007) ‘Torture and the ethics of photography’, ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1068/d2506jb.
Callahan, W.A. (2015) ‘The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), pp. 891–910. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815578767.
Campbell, D. (2007) ‘Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict’, Political Geography, 26(4), pp. 357–382. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005.
Dean, M. (2010) Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781446205747.
Enloe, C. (2004) ‘III “Gender” is not enough: the need for a feminist consciousness’, International Affairs, 80(1), pp. 95–97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00370.x.
Enloe, C. (2014) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6.
Etherington, K. (2007) ‘Ethical Research in Reflexive Relationships’, Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5), pp. 599–616. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301175.
Fanon, F. (2008) Black skin, white masks. [New ed.]. London: Pluto Press. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781849644532.
Farson, A.S. and Phythian, M. (2011) ‘Chapter 4 The Politics of Commissions of Inquiry into Security and Intelligence Controversies in Britain [IN] Commissions of Inquiry and National Security’, in Commissions of inquiry and national security: comparative approaches. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger Security International. Available at: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780313384691.
FRANK MÖLLER (2009) ‘The looking/not looking dilemma’, Review of International Studies, 35(4). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588074?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Grix, Jonathan (2002) ‘Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research.’, Politics., 22(Issue 3). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=7317022&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (1997) ‘The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology [IN] Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science’, in Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Halperin, S. and Heath, O. (2017) Political research: methods and practical skills. Second edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hancke, Bob (2010) ‘Chapter 11: The challenge of research design [IN] Theory and Methods in Political Science’, in Theory and methods in political science. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780230366640.
Hansen, L. (2000) ‘Gender, Nation, Rape: Bosnia and the Construction of Security’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 3(1), pp. 55–75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740010019848.
Hansen, L. (2014) ‘Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations’, in Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 14–23. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=43&docID=1744166&tm=1543415143648.
HANSEN, L. (2015) ‘How images make world politics: International icons and the case of Abu Ghraib’, Review of International Studies, 41(02), pp. 263–288. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000199.
Hansen, Lene (2017) ‘Reading Comics for the Field of International Relations: Theory, Method and the Bosnian War’, European Journal of International Relations, pp. 581–608. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=1669716&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Haraway, D (2013) ‘The persistence of vision [IN] The Visual Culture Reader’, in The visual culture reader. 3rd ed. Abingdon, Oxon [England]: Routledge.
Hart, C. (2018) Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. 2nd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Hobbs, D. and Wright, R. (2006) The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. London: SAGE. Available at: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-fieldwork.
Hollis, M. and Smith, S.M. (1990) Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Clarendon.
Homan, R. (1992) ‘The Ethics of Open Methods’, The British Journal of Sociology, 43(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/591538.
Howarth, D.R. (2000) Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335231836.
Hutchings, Kimberly (2008) ‘1988 and 1998: Contrast and continuity in feminist international relations’, MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808093732.
‘Introduction and Chapter 1 [IN] Research Methods in Politics’ (2008) in Research methods in politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Iraq Inquiry - Sir John Chilcot’s public statement, 6 July 2016 (no date). Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20171123124608/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-inquiry/sir-john-chilcots-public-statement/.
J. Ann Tickner (1997) ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, 41(4). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855.
Jackson, P.T. (2011) The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. London: Routledge. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315731360.
Jan Jindy Pettman (1996) Worlding Women : A Feminist International Politics. 1st edn. Routledge. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=254158.
Jean Baudrillard (2000) ‘Photography, Or The Writing Of Light’, CTheory, pp. 4-12/2000. Available at: https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14605/5462.
Jeremy Walker; Melinda Cooper (2011) ‘Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation’, Security, 42(2), pp. 143–160. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26301757&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Jones, A. and Taylor & Francis (2009) Gender inclusive: essays on violence, men, and feminist international relations. London: Routledge. Available at: http://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&redirectUri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.taylorfrancis.com%2Fbooks%2F9780203887097.
Kirin Narayan (1993) ‘How Native Is a “Native” Anthropologist?’, American Anthropologist, 95(3). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/679656?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Klotz, A. and Prakash, D. (2008) Qualitative methods in international relations: a pluralist guide. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230584129.
Koo, KL (2002) ‘Confronting a disciplinary blindness: Women, war and rape in the international politics of security’, AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE; [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114022000032744.
Kurki, M. (2008) ‘Chapter 1 [IN] Causation in international relations: reclaiming causal analysis.’, in Causation in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491481.
Kurki, M and Wright, C (2006) ‘International Relations and Social Science [IN] International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lamont, C. (2015a) ‘Chapter 1 Research Methods in International relations [IN] Research methods in international relations’, in Research methods in international relations. London: SAGE, pp. 13–29.
Lamont, C. (2015b) ‘Chapter 2 Research questions and Research Design [IN] Research methods in international relations’, in Research methods in international relations. London: SAGE, pp. 30–48.
Lamont, C. (2015c) ‘Chapter 4 Writing a Literature Review [IN] Research methods in international relations’, in Research methods in international relations. London: SAGE, pp. 64–76. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2f0a4927-bffe-e811-80cd-005056af4099.
Latham, Alan (2003) ‘Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method.’, Environment & Planning A., 35(Issue 11), pp. 1993–2017. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=11838882&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Lebow, R.N. (2014) Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107256538.
Letherby, G. (2003) Feminist research in theory and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335226160.
Lisle, D. and Johnson, H.L. (2018) ‘Lost in the aftermath’, Security Dialogue [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618762271.
Little, R. (1991) ‘International Relations and the Methodological Turn’, Political Studies, 39(3), pp. 463–478. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01623.x.
Mamdani, M. (2012) Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt2jbqkf.
Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. (2010) Theory and methods in political science. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230366640.
Metz, C. (1985) ‘Photography and Fetish’, October, 34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/778490.
Michael J. Shapiro (2008) Cinematic Geopolitics. 1st edn. Taylor & Francis Group. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=362260.
Milliken, Jennifer (no date) ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods.’, European Journal of International Relations., 5(Issue 2). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4543934&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Mirzoeff, N. (2013) ‘Introduction: For Critical Visuality Studies [IN] The Visual Culture Reader’, in The visual culture reader. 3rd ed. Abingdon, Oxon [England]: Routledge.
Moon, C. (2006) ‘Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa’, Social & Legal Studies [Preprint]. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/solestu15&id=253.
Moore, Cerwyn; Shepherd, Laura J. (2010) ‘Aesthetics and International Relations: Towards a Global Politics.’, Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations., 24(Issue 3), pp. 299–309. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2010.485564.
Paul Messaris (1994) Visual ‘literacy’. Boulder: Westview Press. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/fulcrum.0r967441j.
Peterson, V.S. (1992) Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner.
Phythian, Mark (2012) ‘Policing Uncertainty: Intelligence, Security and Risk.’, Intelligence & National Security., 27(Issue 2), pp. 187–205. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2012.661642.
Ralph, Jason (2011) ‘After Chilcot: the “doctrine of international community” and the UK decision to invade Iraq’, Journal of Politics & International Relations, 13(3). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ich&AN=ICHA981628&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Ranciere, J (2013) ‘Notes on the photographic image  [IN] The Visual Culture Reader’, in The visual culture reader. 3rd ed. Abingdon, Oxon [England]: Routledge.
Review by:        R. Charli Carpenter (2002) ‘Review: Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Nonfeminist Standpoint?’, International Studies Review, 4(3). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186468?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
‘Review of International Studies’ (2009), 35(4). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40025355.
Ribbens McCarthy, J. and Edwards, R. (1998) Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: public knowledge and private lives. London: SAGE. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/feminist-dilemmas-in-qualitative-research.
Ridley, D. (2012) The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
Riley, R.L., Mohanty, C.T. and Pratt, M.B. (2008) Feminism and war: confronting US imperialism. London: Zed. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781848133662.
Rose, G. (2016) Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. 4th edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Rose, G. and Tolia-Kelly, D.P. (2012) Visuality/materiality: images, objects and practices. Farnham: Ashgate. Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315547930.
Rowley, C. (2014) ‘Popular culture and the politics of the visual [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations’, in Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=1744166.
Said, E.W. (1994) Culture and imperialism. Vintage paperback ed. London: Vintage. Available at: https://app.kortext.com/borrow/365518.
Said, E.W. (2003) Orientalism. reprint with a new preface. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Sayad, A., Bourdieu, P. and Macey, D. (2004) The suffering of the immigrant. Cambridge, England: Polity. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=5326885.
Schlag, G. and Geis, A. (2017) ‘Visualizing violence: aesthetics and ethics in international politics’, Global Discourse, 7(2–3), pp. 193–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1359995.
Shepherd, Laura J. (2017) ‘Aesthetics, Ethics, and Visual Research in the Digital Age: "Undone in the Face of the Otter’’, MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES; [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816684255.
Smith, L.T. (2012a) ‘Chapter 12 Getting the Story Right, Telling the Story Well: Indigenous Activism, Indigenous Research [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples’, in Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Second edition. London: Zed Books, pp. 343–359. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=342&docID=1426837&tm=1543417016202.
Smith, L.T. (2012b) ‘Introduction [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples’, in Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Second edition. London: Zed Books, pp. 30–56. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=29&docID=1426837&tm=1543416913061.
Spivak, G.C. (1988) In other worlds: essays in cultural politics. New York: Routledge.
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires (1998) ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’, Review of International Studies, 24(2). Available at: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Thomas, O.D. (2017) ‘Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry’, Politics, 37(4), pp. 371–385. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716688488.
Tony Blair statement in response to The Report of the Iraq Inquiry (no date). Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-tony-blair-read-response-statement-in-full-iraq-war-inquiry-a7123251.html.
V. Spike Peterson (1999) Global gender issues. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Vicki Squire: 12 days in Lampedusa: The potential and perils of a photo essay @FocaalBlog (no date). Available at: http://www.focaalblog.com/2016/01/11/vicki-squire-12-days-in-lampedusa-the-potential-and-perils-of-a-photo-essay/.
VUCETIC, S. (2011) ‘Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 37(03), pp. 1295–1312. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000938.
Weldes, J. and Rowley, C. (2015) ‘So, how does popular culture relate to world politics? [IN] Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies’, in Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing, pp. 11–34. Available at: http://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Pop-Culture-and-World-Politics-E-IR.pdf.
Young, R. (2001) Postcolonialism: an historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zalewski, M. (1995) ‘“Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?”’, International Affairs, 71(2), pp. 339–356. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2623438.
Zalewski, M. (2014) ‘Feminist International Relations: Making sense ... [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations’, in Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 3–13. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=32&docID=1744166&tm=1543402809598.
Zalewski, M. and Parpart, J.L. (1998) ‘‘Introduction: From the "Woman” Question to the "Man” Question in International Relations’ [IN] The "Man” Question in International Relations’, in The ‘man’ question in international relations. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Zalewski, Marysia. (no date) Feminism after postmodernism : theorising through practice. London : Routledge, 2000.